|
.
Bulk carrier safety
A Conference convened by IMO in November 1997 adopted new measures
to enhance the safety of bulk carriers, incorporated in a new
Chapter XII of the SOLAS Convention. The new provisions are due
to enter into force on 1 July 1999, but are only regarded as
an interim measure, and the IMO Maritime Safety Committee has
continued work on developing additional requirements for both
new and existing ships.
Consideration of bulk carrier safety has continued at an intensive
level, sustained not only by the disturbing loss of a further
six bulk carriers (and 63 lives) over the past twelve months,
but also by the Assessors' report on the findings of the surveys
of the wreckage of the British-flag bulk carrier Derbyshire,
which sank with all hands in September 1980. It has been
generally accepted that the findings are relevant to the current
debate, though the Derbyshire was a newer ship and of
different design from the bulk carrier casualties of recent years.
ICS has continued to be actively engaged in all the discussions
on this subject. It is a matter of concern to ICS that several
bulk carriers are reported to have reached ports of refuge with
fractures and structural failure in circumstances which might
easily have turned into serious casualties had weather conditions
or the ships' positions been different. Information on the number
and severity of these incidents has been difficult to obtain
and this lack of evidence is a serious handicap to identifying
the causes of such failures. ICS is also concerned about the
structural integrity of more recently built bulk carriers, and
enquiries are being made to ascertain if structural failures
have been experienced on modern tonnage.
A particular matter now under study is the strength of hatch
covers. Some three years ago ICS questioned whether hatch cover
standards were adequate to withstand heavy seas, but the subject
was not given high priority. Now, in part due to the Derbyshire
report, the matter is on the agenda. ICS supports all practical
measures to enhance bulk carrier safety but believes that the
root cause of the structural failures must be clearly identified
and comprehensively addressed. Attacking the problem with piecemeal
modifications merely creates uncertainty and continuing doubts
about the effectiveness of such measures.
A matter which has still not been satisfactorily resolved is
the potential damage to ships caused during loading and discharging
operations. It is hoped that the new IMO Code of Practice for
the Safe Loading and Unloading of Bulk Carriers will go some
way towards alleviating the problem but reports indicate that
many terminals are reluctant to change their old ways. Terminals
are outside the scope of port state control, and a concerted
effort is needed to encourage a change of attitude on their part.
It is quite unacceptable that ships which protest about unreasonable
terminal operations are sometimes threatened with fines and blacklisting,
a practice altogether inconsistent with international efforts
to improve safety.
.
|